Defamation Act comes into force

New libel laws come into force today that aim to protect academics from the threat of legal action when writing peer-reviewed material in journals

January 1, 2014

The Defamation Act is designed to give those publicly expressing opinions clearer and better protection than previous libel laws.

The government said the changes will reverse the “chilling effect on freedom of expression current libel law has allowed”, and allow legitimate debate.

Critics believed that old libel laws failed to protect freedom of expression and open and honest public debate. In the past, scientists and academics claimed they faced unfair legal threats for fairly criticising a company, person or product.

Under the new law, which covers England and Wales, claimants must prove that any statements made against them have caused serious harm before action can be taken.

Justice minister Shailesh Vara said: “The introduction of these new measures will make it harder for wealthy people or companies to bully or silence those who may have fairly criticised them or their products.”

The move comes after four years of work by the Libel Reform Campaign, comprised of the organisations Sense about Science, Index on Censorship and English PEN.

Cases that sparked the campaign, which garnered considerable public backing, included that of science writer Simon Singh. He was sued by the British Chiropractic Association for saying they “happily promote bogus treatments” in a 2008 article, a case they later dropped.

Cardiologist Peter Wilmhurst also became a cause celebre having been sued by US company NMT Medical for questioning the safety of one of its heart devices at an academic conference.

Tracey Brown, director of Sense about Science, said that the Act was a “major step forward” in reforming libel laws. She added that protection for reviewed papers will help scientists and science publishers make decisions about what to publish based on truth rather than the fear of being sued.

Ms Brown added: “A lot will depend on how the courts apply the new law. We will keep it under review to see that the law does give scientists the increased confidence to publish that it promises.”

The new act provides qualified privilege to peer-reviewed material published in scientific and academic journals. According to analysis of the act by Sense about Science, this privilege will also extend to international conferences and court proceedings.

It also offers protection for those who publish material that is in the public interest, and stops repeated claims being made against a publisher over the same material.

holly.else@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Its a disgrace that it took 4 years of campaigning to get this law passed.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest