Competition body expected to run market study of sector

Fees would be a focus in Competition and Markets Authority investigation, sources believe

January 30, 2014

Source: Kobal

There’ll be no hiding|: price competition would be a big focus of any investigation of a higher education market

The new Competition and Markets Authority is thought likely to undertake a “market study” of English higher education as one of its first cases – scrutinising the setting of tuition fees by universities and possibly even the £9,000 cap itself.

The CMA is due to take over the roles of the Competition Commission and the Office of Fair Trading from April, and it will be eager to prove its effectiveness if it tackles higher education.

Higher education sources say that it is likely that the OFT will follow up its initial call for information on English undergraduate education, which closed to submissions in December, with a full market study that could last a year.

Possible outcomes from a market study include recommendations to the government to change policy or “competition or consumer enforcement action”, according to the OFT website.

Sonia Sodha, head of public services at Which?, said the organisation is “really hopeful” that the OFT “will respond to our call” to undertake a market study.

Which? has an influential role in regard to the OFT. It can trigger a market study with a “super-complaint” – but there is not thought to be any prospect of such a move at present.

“There is evidence that the higher education system isn’t working as well as it could to deliver value for money for students,” Ms Sodha said. She cited concerns about the “variability” of the academic experience at different universities, about the information that universities provide on factors affecting student choice (such as graduate earnings) and about the obstacles to students “switching” between institutions.

Which? surveyed 26,000 students to explore the academic experience in a study published with the Higher Education Policy Institute last year.

‘Problems in the market’

In its submission to the OFT’s call, Which? cites fees among the “evidence that there are problems in the market”. It continues: “Fees will average £8,600 in 2014-15, very close to the £9,000 cap, despite evidence of wide variance in terms of the academic experience (for example, amount and type of scheduled teaching and amount and nature of feedback) and also the outcomes that graduates of particular courses and institutions achieve in the labour market.”

Which? also warns that regulation “has become increasingly light touch and the Quality Assurance Agency regulatory framework focuses more on processes than outcomes”.

After highlighting risks from the planned abolition of undergraduate number controls, Which? adds: “There is a risk that, as the market in HE further develops, academic quality could decline…The regulator is not acting as a back-stop to ensure that quality and standards are protected and there are not adequate regimes in place to protect students where universities fail.”

The prospect of an OFT examination of higher education was anticipated last year in a paper co-authored by David Palfreyman, director of the Oxford Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies.

He told Times Higher Education that a market study would need to address fees. “Is there price competition among suppliers to the benefit of consumers, or is there ‘tacit collusion’ whereby the inefficient operation of the market encourages suppliers to drift towards charging the same (high) price because they have no incentive to charge less?”

Another key question, Mr Palfreyman continued, was whether “government interference in terms of still setting a price cap” is “contributing to market inefficiency”.

Fees focus

Universities UK’s submission to the OFT starts by addressing fees – indicating that the issue is likely to be a key battleground.

While UUK notes that average fees were about £8,200 in 2012‑13, it says that “this clustering is understandable” – highlighting that income from higher fees was a substitute for much reduced public funding and was “not additional income”.

UUK also says that “the primary basis for competition in the sector has been quality, and in this sense the fee level acts as a signal of quality of provision”.

The submission from GuildHE highlights the pace of policy change and appears to warn the OFT against opening the door to drastic action.

GuildHE argues that “we should acknowledge that the current regime is incomplete and that legislation should be the primary way to address the majority of the issues that the OFT raises. Requirements for changes in the meantime may not necessarily be helpful and recommendations or next steps should assess potential impact with this in mind.”

The OFT plans to announce its decision on whether to go ahead with a market study in mid-March.

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Its a sure thing fees will go up. The market forces in operation monster has been unbagged for managers, academics and student alike. Who can and how can it possibly be stopped.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi