Commission publishes amended proposal for rules of participation in FP6

January 16, 2002

Brussels, 15 January 2002

An amended proposal for the rules of participation in the Sixth Framework programme (FP6) has been published by the European Commission.

Two major changes were made to the initial text, following discussions at the last Research Council in Brussels in December. They are the removal of the definition of instruments (in chapter II) and the indication of the Community financial contribution according to type of instrument. These clauses have instead been transferred to Annex III of the draft decision establishing the Framework programme.

The same has been done in the equivalent proposal of the Euratom programme.

The amended proposal for the new rules of participation in the Framework programme will need to be adopted in a codecision procedure by the European Parliament, whereas for the equivalent document for Euratom needs a unanimous decision by the Council following consultation with the Parliament.

Some of the new features in the rules of participation which differ to those of the previous Framework programme include EU Member States and candidate countries participating on the same footing, European scientific cooperation organisations will be able to participate on the same basis as Member States, financial contributions will be made in the form of grants for integration or grants to the budget, depending on whether they are directed to networks of excellence or integrated projects, and finally, consortia will be able to change partners, subject to observation of the rules.

For the full text of the amended proposal, please consult the following web address: cec.htm

CORDIS RTD-NEWS/© European Communities, 2001

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns