Bizarre behaviour

February 6, 1998

My sociology department has just received its result in the postgraduate training recognition exercise of the Economic and Social Research Council. In addition to telling us that we are not fit for even Mode B (despite being an amalgamation of units rated 3a and 4 in the research assessment exercise) it tells us that we will not be told in what ways our submission is deficient.

If the point of the exercise is to make the ESRC's life easier by restricting outlet numbers, such continence is probably wise. If the purpose is to raise the standard of postgraduate training, it is bizarre.

We long ago gave up grading student work without also providing advice on how it could be improved. If the ESRC wishes to live up to its mission, it should learn from the teaching quality exercises. Judgement without justification is not acceptable.

Steve Bruce

Professor of sociology University of Aberdeen

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Finance Analyst

Bpp University

HR Adviser

University Of The West Of Scotland

Catering Assistant

Edinburgh Napier University