Beware ‘Streisand effect’ on contract cheating, UK’s QAA hears

Hollywood legend’s backfiring legal action offers lessons for universities on essay mills, says researcher

April 26, 2018
barbra streisand
Source: Getty
Don’t rain on my parade: the ‘Streisand effect’ on essay mills means they garner more attention the more adverse publicity they receive

Academics need to consider whether widespread warnings about the dangers of buying ghost-written assignments will actually increase their use, a UK conference has heard.

Phil Newton, director of learning and teaching at Swansea University Medical School, told the Quality Assurance Agency’s annual conference at the Royal Welsh College of Music & Drama in Cardiff that universities should think about the so-called “Streisand effect” when they explain to students policies around those caught using essay mills and their availability.

The phenomenon is named after the American actor and singer Barbra Streisand, whose attempts to suppress the publication of pictures of her Malibu home in 2003 led to worldwide attention for the images, which would have otherwise gone largely unnoticed.

Professor Newton, whose research found that there are more than 1,000 essays mills operating worldwide, told delegates on 25 April that it would be unwise to have an institution-wide poster campaign about the perils of contract cheating because this would give too much publicity to these websites.

Nonetheless, academics could not ignore the subject. Students are increasingly targeted with advertising, rather than actively seeking out websites to purchase essays.

“Students have recently received Facebook adverts that appear to have university logos and I think we have a duty to let them know they aren’t genuine,” said Professor Newton, who added it was almost certain that “your students will have been contacted”.

Ghost-written essays are also much more affordable because of the growing number of individuals prepared to write customised essays to order, said Professor Newton. In some cases, prices were roughly half what they were a few years ago, with some providers now employing about 60 full-time staff in the UK to process orders, he said.

“If you want a 4,000 word essay on any subject you want, you can have it in about six hours for about £40 to £50 and it will probably be OK [in terms of quality],” Professor Newton continued.

An analysis of student surveys, in which students were asked if they had ever paid for an essay, going back as far as 1981, which Professor Newton has yet to publish, suggests that the use of ghost-written essays is “getting more common”. He said there was “some basis” to what was once described as “hysteria around contract cheating”.

Professor Newton said he was against a law that would make it a criminal act to buy essays online, even though use of essay mills could constitute “false representation” under the 2006 Fraud Act.

However, he said he would support a law targeting essay mills themselves, which are currently not liable to prosecution because it is almost impossible to prove their “intention” to give a student an “unfair advantage”. “They use their terms and conditions to get around this,” Professor Newton added.

Making the activity of essay mills into a “strict liability” offence – which would allow prosecution “regardless of whether there is intent [to deceive] or not” – would do much to deter their proliferation, he concluded.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

Essay mills are dealers in stolen ideas and fraudulent scholarship. Maybe a Market Reduction Approach is needed? Perhaps we need to treat essay mills (and also sites such as Wikipedia - whose senior editors have on several occasions blatantly plagiarised my original findings and refused to cite their first published source) as we do fences for stolen goods. After all, classic Government funded research with prolific thieves and stolen goods dealers thieves shows that successful and prolific fences (stolen goods dealers) promote more thieving See: 'Handling stolen goods and theft: A market reduction approach' by M Sutton, K Johnston, H Lockwood (1998) Home Office Research Study 178

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments