AUT wants a PRB

September 11, 1998

As chair of the Association of University Teachers national administrative staff committee, I want to distance that body of staff we represent from the submission of the Association of University Administrators to the Independent Review Committee on higher education pay and conditions (the Bett committee) and, in particular, from the AUA's perverse stance on the major issue of a statutory independent pay review body.

The AUT has been campaigning long and vociferously for a PRB. The AUA, by its own admission, is not primarily concerned with pay and conditions. Moreover, unlike the AUT, it is not recognised by the employers as a negotiating body. In such circumstances, it is regrettable that it has moved to undermine the AUT's campaign. The AUA is opposed to a PRB but its submission to Bett does not suggest an alternative. Indeed the very argument the AUA uses to object to such a body - that "higher education institutions are not homogeneous but a diverse group of individual employers with widely differing funding arrangements and capabilities" - is one that seems more logically to support it. I also challenge the contention that "the imposition of unfunded pay awards by a review body would be damaging to HEIs": the AUT's evidence is that public-sector pay review body groups have been funded much better than non-PRB groups.

In conclusion, it is not clear how the interests of administrative staff nationally will be best served under the AUA's scheme of things.

Susan Harte Chair AUT administrative staff committee

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments