Applicants put little trust in university advertising

Prospective students more likely to base decision on prospectuses, institutions’ websites and campus visits, survey suggests

August 26, 2015
'Education Just Ahead' university advert billboard

Prospective students are most likely to trust information about universities that they perceive to be impartial and place only limited weight on advertising and social media, a study suggests.

A survey of 1,475 applicants to undergraduate courses at UK universities found that more than half the respondents regarded information that they gleaned from a visit to an institution or from the Ucas website as being highly trustworthy.

The other most trusted sources of information were the university website, in which 46.6 per cent of respondents put a high level of trust, and printed prospectuses, which scored 42.8 per cent.

In contrast, only 26 per cent of respondents said they regarded university advertising as being highly trustworthy, and just 14.5 per cent put a high level of trust in social media, according to results published in the Journal of Marketing for Higher Education.

Paul Gibbs, director of the Centre for Education Research and Scholarship at Middlesex University, and Aftab Dean, a senior lecturer at Leeds Beckett University’s School of Strategy, Marketing and Communication, write that “trust in the authority of information about universities relies on it being impartial”.

Social media, they say, appears to be regarded as being a “fun, conversational” mode of communication through which students “may seek opinion but not detailed information on which to base decisions”.

Universities have spent increasing amounts on marketing following the introduction of £9,000 tuition fees in England, with a Times Higher Education investigation revealing last year that spending at 70 institutions had increased by a third in two years.

Institutions have also devoted growing attention to their social media presence, but the authors say their findings should have “considerable impact” on how universities spend their communications budgets.

“The main sources that are both informative and trusted are those that are perceived as factual and not as marketing from the university,” the paper says.

Professor Gibbs told THE that advertising and social media could potentially play an important role in directing students towards prospectuses, websites and open days. But the shift away from traditional sources of information “has not been as significant” as it has been in other sectors, he said. 

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Applicants put little faith in sector adverts

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham