Appetite for construction: finance directors ready to spend

Nearly half of all university finance directors believe now is a good time to be taking “greater risk” onto their balance sheets, according to a survey by consultants Deloitte.

August 19, 2013

While some are adopting a “wait and see” approach towards the new, more competitive student recruitment system, others are looking to borrow money to improve the student experience and finance a growth in numbers.

Forty-seven per cent say now is a good time to take risk onto their balance sheets.

The Higher Education Finance Directors Survey reports that many of those surveyed said their universities needed to “invest considerably in order to maintain their competitive position”.

Another reason for this appetite for risk is the declining cost of credit, the report says.

One third of the 35 respondents said that their university’s level of financial risk had “increased somewhat” in the last year while 6 per cent responded that it had “increased significantly”, although half said that risk levels were the same.

Risk factors include an increase in a university’s ratio of debt to capital or “uncertainty” about the value of its assets.

Asked what areas of expenditure would increase or decrease, the majority of finance directors expected spending on hiring to shrink.

A majority also expected the amount of bank borrowing and bond issuance to grow.

The impact of the coalition’s tougher immigration rules is also being felt in the recruitment of international students, the survey suggests. Close to half of institutions said that changes in government policy had had a “somewhat” negative effect on their numbers from overseas in 2012-13.

Overall, more than nine in ten finance directors said that their institution faces an above average amount of uncertainty.

Julie Mercer, head of education consulting at Deloitte, said: “While uncertainty still remains, there are now signs of a shift. Expansion, and how to fund it, is now a big priority for higher education.”

She added: “Capital expenditure is needed to underpin the expansion of student numbers, support research, meet the demands of the 21st century learning environment and compete in an increasingly global higher education sector.”

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham