Academics swear on Twitter ‘more than expected’

A study has revealed that people can often make the wrong assumption about the level of education of someone tweeting

January 11, 2017
Swear jar
Source: iStock

When we read tweets, what assumptions do we make about the strangers behind the 140 characters?

A group of researchers based at the University of Pennsylvania has carried out a study – “Real Men Don’t Say ‘Cute’” – to identify when people’s preconceived stereotypes about Twitter users are taken too far.

“People might not be aware of [these biases], or they might not present themselves as having them,” co-author Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro, a postdoctoral researcher in the university’s School of Arts and Sciences, told Times Higher Education.

The study, published in Social Psychological and Personality Science, tested the hypothesis that language is full of social cues that run deeper than obvious differences in dialect; we signal our membership of social groups through subtle use of prepositions, articles and pronouns. Women, for instance, tend to use more positive and personal language.

To identify biases, the researchers showed participants a collection of tweets from a single user, removing any contextual clues (such as a profile picture). They then asked the participants to guess an attribute of the Twitter user.

The researchers looked at assumptions made about age, gender, political orientation and level of education. They found that most of the time, the participants were correct in their inferences – although women were often mistaken for men when they discussed technology or the news.

The category in which assumptions failed, however, was level of education. Participants performed particularly badly at identifying tweets written by people with advanced degrees.

“People don’t use stereotypes in the wrong way,” said Dr Preotiuc-Pietro. “They just over-rely on them. For example, they may see a swear word and they say, ‘OK, this person is lower educated.’ Almost everything is exaggerated rather than incorrect.”

The study revealed that people with the lowest levels of education were assumed to frequently swear, talk about themselves, and use conversational abbreviations such as “LOL”. People with advanced degrees were assumed to never curse, and instead talk about technology and conferences.

While there is an element of truth to these assumptions, the participants vastly underestimated levels of education. They guessed that only one in 20 of the selected sample had an advanced degree, while the true figure was one in three. Their findings suggest that people with PhDs and other high-level qualifications are far more profane, informal and self-obsessed than we commonly assume.

Dr Preotiuc-Pietro hopes that their research will challenge our reliance on stereotypes. “The first step in making people correct their stereotypes is to be aware of them,” he said.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Alexander Wedderburn

Former president of the British Psychological Society remembered

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham