A student's worth

June 11, 1999

Neil Kay's claim (Letters, THES, June 4) that the Dearing report's calculation of the rate of return to higher education is fundamentally flawed is itself in error.

The purpose of the exercise was to determine if the flow of graduates should be increased. This requires comparing the expected gain in output made possible by an extra graduate with the costs entailed. As Kay points out, profit-maximising firms hire labour until the cost of another worker equals the value of the output they produce. So, the premium paid to graduates reflects the economic benefit of a marginal expansion in numbers. In this, Dearing's methodology is correct. It turns out that student numbers are about right.

What is true is that the total contribution of graduates to gross national product is more than their total pay. Kay seems to conclude that firms should pay some of the costs of higher education. However, it is also true that the total return to capital is less than its contribution to GNP, as is that of every factor of production. Applying the Kay principle, workers should be required to pay part of capitalists' investment costs. Of course this is ridiculous. Neither equity nor efficiency would be served by either kind of subsidisation policy.

David de Meza

Professor of management, LSE, and professor of economicsUniversity of Exeter

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns