Let’s not go to extremes

October 22, 2015

The irony of Rupert Sutton’s letter is that his organisation’s lack of credibility is the very reason why we raised concerns about Downing Street’s apparent plagiarism of its output (“Credibility of sources is vital”, Letters, 15 October).

Sutton works for Student Rights, the campus-monitoring arm of neoconservative thinktank the Henry Jackson Society – about which he claims we raise no “substantive criticisms”. On the contrary, our report on the HJS details the many flaws in its research and its authoritarian and Islamophobic tendencies.

The former director of Student Rights was Raheem Kassam, who proved too right-wing even for the UK Independence Party as Nigel Farage’s aide. Now HJS’ associate director is Douglas Murray, who once said that “conditions for Muslims in Europe must be made harder across the board”. Do such views qualify the HJS as fit to label others as “extremists”?

Sutton’s claim that Spinwatch is “funded by the very extremists whom the policy aims to challenge” reveals the contested nature of the term “extremism”. For the HJS, it appears that politically active British Muslim groups are extremist if they have the temerity to question British foreign policy, the invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan, or support Palestinian human rights.

It is this kind of misrepresentation that might lead readers to view his organisation – not Spinwatch – as trading in “smears and innuendo”.

Spinwatch is transparent about its donors, HJS is not. It chose to withdraw from its role in two All Party Parliamentary Groups rather than reveal its funders, as Westminster rules require.

Our research did, however, uncover some donors to the HJS, such as the New York-based Abstraction Fund, which also funds the Gatestone Institute. Gatestone publishes the Islamophobic writings of Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, Lars Hedegaard and others.

So, we agree with Rupert Sutton: credibility of sources is vital. The debate on extremism is far too important to be left to the covert influence of shoddy research produced by neoconservative thinktanks.

David Miller and Hilary Aked
University of Bath; Spinwatch

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Position in Archaeology and Cultural History

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD position in Energy and Process Engineering

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD position in Electric Power Engineering

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Research Assistant in Business

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes