Credibility of sources is vital

October 15, 2015



I was disappointed to see your recent article and blog post on the government “naming and shaming” universities over extremist speakers, both of which gave undue prominence to the opinions of partisan activists attempting to smear our work at Student Rights and undermine the government’s counter-extremism efforts (“Prevent strategy: naming and shaming of universities sparks concern”, News, 1 October; “The questions raised by Prevent ‘naming and shaming’”, 5 October).

David Miller and Hilary Aked, quoted as the sole sources of concern about our work, are involved in ongoing campaigns to label the government’s Prevent strategy and its supporters as racist. They do so from within Spinwatch, an organisation funded by the very extremists whom the policy aims to challenge.

Aked has sought support from activists who have declared that apostates should face the death penalty and that Muslims should boycott the police, while a number of extremists, including members of the group Cage, were given a platform at a conference hosted by Miller at the University of Bath this year.

In addition, your reports have referenced poorly informed students’ union motions drafted as part of a campaign run by Aked – inadvertently supporting denigration from a partisan source with material provided to students by that same source.

No substantive criticism of our work is made and instead there are dark claims of “dubious provenance” or “neoconservative…agenda[s]”. This is something that those familiar with Spinwatch’s modus operandi of smears and innuendo will recognise but that should not provide the basis for professional articles in a serious journal such as Times Higher Education.

Rupert Sutton
Student Rights

Send to

Letters should be sent to:

Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns