In good time

December 8, 2016

The editors of the EMBO Journal were glad to be able to publish Enrique Martin-Blanco’s paper (“Academic criticises reviewers after five-year delay to paper”, News, 28 November). The process was, in our view, efficient, including a single round of revision. All the details are documented in the transparent process review file that we publish with most papers.

In our experience, for data and approaches that raise discussion among experts, the EMBO Press cross-referee commenting process works well: all referees see each other’s reports before a decision is made and often comment on specific issues on which they agree or disagree, allowing the editors to make a more nuanced and informed decision. Where appropriate, we also approach the authors before an editorial decision is made to take into account their views on the referee reports.

Bernd Pulverer
Chief editor
EMBO Journal


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments