Who's checking who?

March 3, 2006

One thing puzzles me about the dispute involving Procter and Gamble (P&G) and researchers at Sheffield University. According to the International Conference on Harmonisation guideline for good clinical practice:

"The sponsor should utilise appropriately qualified individuals to supervise the overall conduct of the trial, to handle the data, to verify the data, to conduct the statistical analyses, and to prepare the trial reports." It seems that P&G had such persons, but who was the statistician at Sheffield who was going to check the analysis? Was it a physician? In which case how far must this principle of collegial amateurism be extended? If I collaborate in medical research, will I have to spend time on the wards checking the doctors are getting it right?

Stephen Senn Glasgow University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs