The sordid truth

August 6, 2004

Was Christopher Isherwood a noble man because he was homosexual, or was he a homosexual whose life was, well, sordid? (Letters, July 23). If political correctness prevents us from calling a footloose existence with 400 lovers "sordid", how can we argue convincingly for the valuing of monogamous same-sex relationships? Biography does not have to be hagiography because its subject is homosexual. So, no apology required.

Mark Ogden
Leeds

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments