Signs and signals

July 27, 2007

The articles regarding the relationship that exists between students and their university ("Move to curb student rights", "NUS alarmed by one-sided student contract", July 13) raise many questions. The semiotics of the relationship are crucial - the way people communicate and the messages they receive do tend to reinforce their views.

Are students customers? Yes, they pay money for a variety of services. Are students consumers? No, they should not be because they need to be active participants in the whole process (the Ruth Deech "gym" analogy). Should a new contract be needed? Well, a simplified, clear Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract-compliant contract would be welcome.

Will what is apparently being considered be fit for purpose? It would seem not. Should the courts be faced with more work? No, mediation has a large role to play.

Tim Birtwistle
Professor of the law and policy of higher education
Leeds Law School, Leeds Met

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments