Rights plan all wrong 2

September 20, 2002

MIT's policies are more liberal, not more restrictive, as Sir Alec Broers states. Intellectual property associated with independent research lies with the inventor or author, not with MIT. The proposed intellectual property rules for Cambridge, as I understand them, would result in the intellectual property for independent research ending up with the university.

Ronald L. Rivest
Cambridge, Massachusetts

Details: http://web.mit.edu/ policies/13.1.html

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments