Reason not to believe 2

January 7, 2005

It is hardly a "presumption" to state that a proposal requires evidential support. Otherwise the conviction that pigs can fly would be as valid as that that fish can swim. How else should we distinguish between the claims of an objective observer and a passionate schizophrenic?

Trevor Stone
Glasgow University

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments