Reason not to believe 2

January 7, 2005

It is hardly a "presumption" to state that a proposal requires evidential support. Otherwise the conviction that pigs can fly would be as valid as that that fish can swim. How else should we distinguish between the claims of an objective observer and a passionate schizophrenic?

Trevor Stone
Glasgow University

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please Login or Register to read this article.


Featured jobs

Head of Media Relations

Cranfield University

Customer Service Advisor

Bpp University

Clinic Secretary, Auditory Implant Service

University Of Southampton

Lecturer in Criminology

University Of Lincoln

Resourcing Administrator

Bpp University