Poor show

July 16, 2004

Despite the main theme of his article being the effect of tax on the wealthy, William Rubenstein expresses surprise that "little is known about the very rich in the 20th century compared with other centuries" (Features, July 2). This is hardly surprising as there is now greater reason and capacity to hide wealth.

His claim that "the so-called Age of Affluence appears to have been the age of affluence for everyone except the affluent" is absurd and blatantly ignores the poor, as he does throughout his article. Though he refers to the top rate of tax, he neglects to mention that it has never reached 100 per cent, which is the marginal rate for those unlucky enough to be on welfare.

Richard Wilson

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs

Professor for Renewable Energy Carriers

King Abdullah University Of Science & Technology

Research Associate

United Arab Emirates University

Lecturer in Psychology

University Of Lincoln