Peerless process

July 2, 2004

Contrary to your leader (June 25), the main problem with peer review is that it simply does not live up to its name: reviewer and reviewed are often not peers. On the whole, reviewers represent a more elite sector of the research community than the authors.

Articles accepted for publication tend to have more elite authors than those rejected. The ideas in rejected articles often end up in print a few years later under the name of a more elite author. Coincidence or conspiracy? Either way, researchers increasingly prefer to take their news ideas directly to the media.

Steve Fuller
Warwick University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs