Openly confused

January 6, 2006

I know that conspiracy theories are great fun, including Martin Taylor's (Letters, December 23/30). Better still, they are a distraction from the real argument, which in this case is the Royal Society's wilful conflation of open-access publishing with institutional repositories. Or is the commercial tail of the Royal Society blinding it to scientific rigour? Confusing open-access publishing with mandated deposit in institutional repositories is about as sensible as confusing the Royal Society with the Flat Earth Society.

Derek Law
Strathclyde University

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments