Ruth Scurr's views on proofreading agencies (Opinion, December 15) struck this freelance tutor as confused and disingenuous. So it was OK for her to tidy up a fellow student's PhD thesis for a token reward, but it's dishonest when someone - who may not have such a kind native-speaking friend - pays a professional to do the same?
It is unclear whether or not Scurr believes dyslexics, foreigners and those from the wrong educational background should simply accept lower marks, whether using a spellcheck constitutes cheating or whether she and her colleagues really know how to "teach" the mechanics of writing or the idiomatic subtleties of academic English.
As for the unfairness of charges, is she unaware of the years of tutoring and/or private-school fees that enabled many of her students to get into Cambridge?
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
- Unrestricted access to the UK and global edition of the THE app on IOS, Android and Kindle Fire
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now