OK for some to pay

January 5, 2007

Ruth Scurr's views on proofreading agencies (Opinion, December 15) struck this freelance tutor as confused and disingenuous. So it was OK for her to tidy up a fellow student's PhD thesis for a token reward, but it's dishonest when someone - who may not have such a kind native-speaking friend - pays a professional to do the same?

It is unclear whether or not Scurr believes dyslexics, foreigners and those from the wrong educational background should simply accept lower marks, whether using a spellcheck constitutes cheating or whether she and her colleagues really know how to "teach" the mechanics of writing or the idiomatic subtleties of academic English.

As for the unfairness of charges, is she unaware of the years of tutoring and/or private-school fees that enabled many of her students to get into Cambridge?

Justine Budenz

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

The University of Oxford is top in a list of the best universities in the UK, which includes institutions in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

26 September

Most Commented

Most universities still rely on exams and assessed essays to grade their students. But as the fourth industrial revolution, employability and student satisfaction all rise up the agenda, many experts are suggesting that assessment needs to much more closely resemble real-world tasks. Anna McKie marks the arguments   

23 May