Jane Hutton of Warwick University criticises the recent funding council report on patterns of participation ("Hefce access study 'flawed'", February 11).
I have no wish to defend the report in general, but her letter in the same issue reveals that one of her objections is the absence of confidence intervals. These are a guide to the variability of results due to random sampling.
However, the funding council's report was based on "population" data for each unit and level of analysis, with no sampling. The results will contain an error component, stemming from missing data and perhaps double-counting of individuals, but confidence intervals will not resolve this.
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now