Liberty bell unheard 1

April 22, 2010

Your article, "Balls can act, so why can't I: Lammy was vexed by London Met constraints" (15 April), reported that David Lammy, the higher education minister, was puzzled and frustrated by his inability to intervene directly in London Metropolitan University in the way Ed Balls did with Haringey Council in the "Baby P" case.

If he cannot see the difference between a local council and a university, should he be the minister in charge of the academy? Do centuries of universities' struggles for liberty from the state in Europe mean nothing to him?

Yorick Wilks, University of Oxford.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments