Letter: Those for and against 2

December 21, 2001

We were disturbed by the recent coverage of the AUT election for a new general secretary ("AUT chief race 'rigged'", THES , December 14).

The AUT has used the same rules for electing a general secretary since 1992. In this year's election we were involved in the procedure as members of the shortlisting panel.

The official candidate route allows the union to invite applicants to the election from the widest possible background, including individuals from outside the AUT.

By employing this procedure the union was able to judge each candidate against the job description for the position and ensure that the final choice was able to compete with the best in the entire trade union movement, not just in higher education.

Each of us served in this selection process, not as members of the executive, but as ordinary members elected from the AUT council. The successful official candidate was chosen after a rigorous and open process of interviews, written exercises, tests on management skills and an interview before the entire executive. Now that an official candidate has been chosen they still face an election among all the membership.

Charlie Owen
Institute of Education
Dianne Sutton
Open University
Adrian Pearce
Bradford University

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments