Letter: Real cost of RAE cuts 2

February 22, 2002

My school entered the RAE in 1992 unprepared for and untutored in the strategies needed to create a strong research base. It gained a 2. Over the next four years we built an infrastructure and gained a 3b. In 2001, we gained a 5 rating, creating a cadre of enthusiastic, internationally excellent researchers. It is a challenge to create 5-rated research on 3b funding. The enterprise and drive that achieves this must be fostered. Denial of sufficient funding to 3a and 3b groups will impoverish our nation's research futures. The RAE was never intended to do this.

Stephen Denyer
Head of the School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences
University of Brighton

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs