Letter: How the screw was put in scrutiny (2)

August 31, 2001

The resignation of John Randall as chief executive of the QAA points up the folly of abolishing the Council for National Academic Awards when the polytechnics were made universities.

The CNAA was not perfect, but it was on the right lines. The system was one of independent, externally monitored peer review, operating through respected subject boards, permanent but with rolling membership, and based on explicit criteria and open dialogue.

Anyone serious about quality assurance should look again at the successes of the CNAA. It is not yet too late.

John Radford
Chair, psychology board, CNAA, 1978-84.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments