Letter: Hidden assets 1

November 23, 2001

As an administrator, I was delighted, at last, to read something about the admin side of higher education ("Underpaid, overlooked", THES , November 16).

But I take issue with the term "non-academic" staff. It is patronising and insulting. It implies that these staff have no qualifications or experience and offers an excuse for their often being "underpaid" and "overlooked". "Administrative support staff" is the preferred choice. Please spread the word.

Keith Wright
Senior programme administrator
Liverpool John Moores University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs