Letter: Ethical balances

January 18, 2002

I doubt if many members of self-styled "ethics" committees would know cant from Kant or soccer from Socrates.

If all they offer is superfluous and often amateur advice on research methodology, why don't they say so? If, as Frank Furedi suggests, they provide a bureaucratic litigation risk-avoidance mechanism - again, why don't they say so? To appropriate the name of ethics is unjustified.

Gill Rowley
Research fellow
Employment Studies Unit
University of the West of England

to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Featured jobs