Ensure integrity in industry links 5

December 2, 2005

Whatever the truth of the detail in the case of research data management you expose, there is enough undisputed evidence to suggest the practices may be more widespread. This is meat and drink to sociologists of scientific knowledge, and could add to the risk of undermining public confidence in science.

It also raises critical questions for the research assessment exercise. There has been considerable sensitivity about the question of multiple-author outputs and how sub-panels should assess the contributions of individuals. Now we have evidence that in some commercially sensitive industry-sponsored research authors may not have had access to the entire empirical data set; authors may not have participated in any of the data analysis or even in discussion about its nature; and authors may have had their manuscripts written by hired writers. How should we judge commercially sponsored research in this environment?

Keith Richards


to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Featured jobs