Editorial support

January 21, 2010

Following your report on the Medical Hypotheses affair ("Unclear outlook for radical journal as HIV/Aids deniers evoke outrage", 14 January), I wrote to many of the people who have published in the journal recently. I have so far received well over a hundred supportive emails, many of which I have forwarded to the publisher, Elsevier.

It has been a heart-warming experience for this editor to discover from personal accounts how much Medical Hypotheses is valued, and what a positive difference it has made to so many medical researchers all around the world.

Bruce G. Charlton, Editor-in-chief, Medical Hypotheses, Professor of theoretical medicine University of Buckingham.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs