Don't stint on maths

October 5, 2007

Jim Al-Khalili argues that one should not consider the new ISciences degrees to be a "science-lite soft option" but rather the gateway to "a career in some cutting-edge research field" (Opinion, September 28). I was therefore surprised to find that the entry requirement at his institution, Surrey University, was lower in mathematics for ISciences than for the physics programme. Surely a challenging interdisciplinary programme requires a stronger command of the basic language of science than a more traditional degree programme? It would be most unfortunate if the message went out to the next generation of potential scientists that the best route to a career in cutting-edge research involved skimping on mathematics at school

Michael Merrifield
Professor of astronomy Nottingham University

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments