Distorted visions 1

December 17, 2004

Your account of the controversy about the girl with "X-ray vision" (December 10) was so obviously biased that I wondered why your reporter felt the need to display his prejudices.

He said Brian Josephson is "scorned by colleagues for his enthusiasm for the paranormal", whereas he called Richard Wiseman a key member of the "respected" Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. He could have said with at least as much accuracy that the CSICOP is an ideologically motivated debunking organisation and that Josephson is much respected for his courage and independence.

It would have been more respectful of readers' diverse views simply to report the controversy without taking sides.

Rupert Sheldrake
London

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Track runner slow off the starting blocks

Lack of independent working blamed for difficulties making the leap from undergraduate to doctoral work

Quality under magnifying glass

Hefce's new standards regime will enable universities to focus on what matters to students, says Susan Lapworth

Woman tearing up I can't sign

Schools and universities are increasingly looking at how improving personalities can boost social mobility. But in doing so, they may be forced to choose between teaching what is helpful, and what is true, says David Matthews

Door peephole painted as bomb ready to explode

It’s time to use technology to detect potential threats and worry less about outdated ideas of privacy, says Ron Iphofen

A keyboard with a 'donate' key

Richard Budd mulls the logic of giving money to your alma mater