Cavalier attitude

June 20, 2003

Your Whistleblowers report about alleged academic corruption in the journalism department at Liverpool John Moores University ( THES , June 6) was based largely on documents I submitted to an industrial tribunal in 2002.

For an LJMU spokeswoman to say that my claims are "factually inaccurate" is nonsense. My statement was distributed to all parties, and I attended the tribunal to be examined on those allegations. No one - including LJMU's solicitor and Dick Rooney, former head of the journalism department - challenged any part of what I said or wrote, and the tribunal chairman accepted my statement as true.

The issue of standards in the journalism department at LJMU is a matter of legitimate public interest. That it should be dismissed by LJMU as a "playground fight" says much about the university's cavalier attitude to a legitimate inquiry that The THES made about academic standards.

LJMU cannot "categorically refute" my allegations because the forum for doing this has now passed.

Adrian Quinn
University of Liverpool

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs