Blue skies turn grey

April 3, 2008

Philip Esler laudably stresses the importance of "impact in its broadest sense" and argues that Research Councils UK wants to see much more than just "narrow monetary impact" from the research it funds.

Esler should ensure that all research councils are singing from the same hymn sheet, however. At a recent open meeting, John Armitt, the chairman of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, was asked whether the EPSRC considered the terms "economic benefit" and "societal benefit" to be effectively synonymous. (Video footage of the meeting is available at www.epsrc.ac.uk.) Clearly bemused, Armitt argued that he saw no distinction and dismissed the issue as a "non-question". Perhaps one should expect little more from an ex-chief executive of Network Rail, but in future it might be helpful if Esler makes sure that Armitt stays "on message".

Esler goes on to state that "blue-skies, pioneering research must be at the heart of what we do". This is a remarkable statement given that EPSRC has very recently cut up to 15 per cent from the responsive mode budget to support its new top-down managed "mission programmes" ("EPSRC cuts to blue-skies funding raise concern", 20 March).

In what sense does this place blue-skies research at the heart of the RCUK's mission?

Philip Moriarty, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs