Annoying Day job

February 23, 2007

Thanks for ruining my weekend with your latest issue. I suppose in the good old days, when we had staff rooms, there'd be a corner where people such as Gary Day (Columnist, February 16) could mutter quietly to themselves without annoying anyone.

Sadly, now it seems your opinion pages are the only place where he is able to rant about how, in his day, students did as they were told and "teaching" consisted of giving them a reading list and telling them to be "inspired". I can't decide whether to feel sorry for his students or happy - if they are allowed to get away with writing the ill-informed, patronising and pretentious rubbish he does then they are on to a winner.

Gary, some of us take teaching and learning seriously, and whatever your beef is with those who consider pedagogy useful, you might read the research you criticise rather than simply skimming the abstracts. You wouldn't let your students get away with it, so why should you?

Jonathan Baldwin.
Dundee University

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October