Animal wrongs 1

September 17, 2004

So, yet more articles in The Times Higher on animal experiments that give the views of the pro-vivisection lobby without reporting those of the pro-animal side ("Science fears attacks will rise with the Act" and "Freedom for many is tyranny for the few", September 10).

If they had been consulted, the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection or the National Anti-Vivisection Society would have given legitimate reasons for using freedom of information laws to request details of what goes on in laboratories.

They might also have pointed out that, given the proven unreliability of animal-based tests as predictors of human reactions, open access to clinical data is crucial if we are to determine whether resources should continue to go into animal experiments or should instead be diverted into the development and use of superior methods.

Miles Layram

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs

Student Researcher

University Of Greenwich

Recruitment Officer (Channel Management)

University College Dublin (ucd)

Assistant Professor in Finance

Durham University

Research Associate

Kings College London