PA Consulting Group's survey of vice-chancellors shows that top-up fees will neither address universities' funding shortfall nor stop some vice-chancellors from focusing on balance sheets at the expense of good practice and social objectives ("V-cs can't afford poor", February ).
Most universities are funded primarily by the taxpayer through a government committed to improving access. Its message is that only fee income can improve universities' finances. If some students yield higher fees than others, the implications for underrepresented groups are bleak.
Has any vice-chancellor looked at how top-up fees will affect black and ethnic minority UK student recruitment?
If this government is serious about social inclusion and widening participation, it must recognise that university teaching is underfunded, and that market solutions always exclude the poor.
Head of universities department
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Sign in now