Western civilisation courses prompt Australian revolts

Controversial course proposals a test for governance, opponents say

April 15, 2019
Source: iStock

Plans for lavishly funded “great books” courses are under a cloud, amid academic revolts at two Australian universities.

The executive and the governing council of the University of Wollongong have closed ranks over vice-chancellor Paul Wellings’ approval of a degree bankrolled by the Ramsay Centre for Western Civilisation, a philanthropic organisation.

Meanwhile, proposals to offer Ramsay-funded majors at the University of Queensland have hit a snag, after the board of studies for UQ’s humanities and social sciences faculty unanimously rejected the draft curricula.

The developments at both institutions suggest that the conflict over the planned courses – opposed by many staff and students because of perceptions that they curtail academic autonomy and champion a “Western supremacist” perspective – are increasingly becoming a test of university governance.

Wollongong avoided a staff and student backlash by negotiating with Ramsay in secret, and announcing an agreement in December as a fait accompli. Professor Wellings then bypassed academic senate scrutiny of the proposed course by approving it under “fast-track” procedures, a move that the university says was necessary to meet publication deadlines for a 2020 course handbook.

In late March, the academic senate lodged a formal protest. Insiders said that the fast-track process was typically used to “tweak” existing courses and had never been used to endorse an entire new programme.

On 10 April the National Tertiary Education Union launched proceedings in the New South Wales Supreme Court, seeking to have the fast-track approval overturned. But at a 12 April meeting, the university council sided with the executive.

“I am comfortable that the decisions taken by the vice-chancellor have been in accordance with university policies and in the best interests of the institution,” chancellor Jillian Broadbent said in a statement issued by the university.

That view is not shared by staff and students who protested prior to the meeting. Chloe Rafferty, president of the Wollongong Undergraduate Student Association, said that the university council should have recognised the position of the academic senate “which is supposed to be the body that ensures our university has academic integrity”.

Ms Rafferty said that she had been denied access to the council meeting to discuss a budget for the student union – an address that she said had been planned for months – with three security guards barring her entry. The university said that Ms Rafferty had not registered her intention to attend the meeting – a claim that she denied.

NTEU Wollongong branch president Georgine Clarsen said that she had written to the university council members explaining why the union had taken legal action, enclosing copies of the court documentation, to ensure that the issue would not be “swept under the carpet”.

She said that the university’s governance unit had refused to confirm whether the information had been passed on to council members.

NTEU national president Alison Barnes said that the union had initiated legal proceedings because of the “gradual and persistent erosion of academic governance” at universities such as Wollongong. 

The Supreme Court has the power to overturn Wollongong’s administrative decisions because the university was established under state legislation. The first hearing is set for 23 April.

Meanwhile, UQ’s HASS board of studies has warned the faculty’s executive dean that “further consultation and refinement of the curriculum” for proposed Ramsay-funded courses is required.

Many of the faculty’s academics had earlier issued a petition opposing Ramsay-funded courses on academic freedom and institutional autonomy grounds. “There are incalculable reputational risks for the University of Queensland in linking itself to an external body that clearly has a specific political agenda,” the petition says.



Print headline: Western civilisation courses prompt revolt at two Australian universities

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

If someone wants to pay you to sit around reading books, even if their motives are questionable (and aren't everyone's?), it sounds like a win-win to me.
Stephen Cowley is clearly a white male human being.
As opposed to what? Maybe read Major Barbara -GB Shaw for the arguments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October