A Passing Fury: Searching for Justice at the End of World War II, by A. T. Williams

An anecdote about a sandwich illustrates the Allies’ struggle to make the Nazis pay, says Hester Vaizey

June 2, 2016
Main gate of Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp
Source: iStock

When the Allies tracked down Heinrich Himmler at the end of the war, they offered him a sandwich. This was not a hospitable move to induce their captive to speak freely. They knew that many of the top Nazis had hidden cyanide capsules on themselves to facilitate a last-ditch way out if they fell into Allied hands. As Hitler and Goebbels had already committed suicide, Himmler – leader of the SS, the Gestapo, the Secret Service – was the biggest name who would face justice for the Nazis’ crimes. The Allies could not afford to let him slip through the net.

After a thorough body search, the interviewer brought forth the thick bread sandwich, reasoning that if Himmler could eat it, then he couldn’t be hiding poison in his mouth. Although Himmler managed to eat the sandwich to the satisfaction of the interviewer, a later search revealed a black capsule hidden in a gap in Himmler’s teeth. Having been found out, Himmler bit down hard on the capsule and the Allies lost their chief culprit for the unspeakable deeds that had come to light at the end of the war. This is but one anecdote of many told in A Passing Fury that paints a picture of the imperfect judicial process at the end of the Second World War.

The liberation of the Nazi death camps revealed the worst of what humanity is capable. What the Allies found prompted the question of whether there could be an adequate response at all. In the end, they decided that a series of trials would be a measured, civilised and appropriate course of action. A Passing Fury records the voyage of discovery by legal scholar and Orwell prizewinning author Andrew Williams as he uncovers the procedures adopted by the British to collect evidence and bring Nazi perpetrators to trial. He is appalled by the evidence he encounters of Nazi brutality in the camps; he laments the poor practices adopted by the lawyers who were totally out of their depth gathering evidence in the dismantled camps; he is dismayed by the British enacting victor’s justice, dressing up their vengeance against wartime enemies as moral superiority when they knew about the nature of the Nazi camps during the war; and he is dissatisfied that so few of the perpetrators were made to pay for their crimes. All of these seem reasonable things to think or feel. But for anyone who has studied the post-war, post-Nazi world, these inadequacies are well known.

The Nuremberg trials gave the Allies a way to root out the head honchos of the Third Reich, and then to move forward and focus on the future of the country that they had occupied. Half-hearted attempts at denazification failed to exact justice against the millions of Germans who had participated in Nazi society to varying degrees. In a perfect world, this would not have happened. But the Hitler years had shown that even in a country that produced cultural greats such as Goethe and Beethoven, it was not a perfect world.

To those who know the subject area, A Passing Fury contains much that is familiar, but nonetheless Williams is a first-rate storyteller who has a gift for bringing the past to life in an accessible and compelling way.

Hester Vaizey is college lecturer, Clare College, Cambridge, and author of Surviving Hitler’s War: Family Life in Nazi Germany (2010) and Born in the GDR: Living in the Shadow of the Wall (2014).

A Passing Fury: Searching For Justice at the End of World War II
By A. T. Williams
Jonathan Cape, 496pp, £25.00
ISBN 9780224099608
Published 26 May 2016

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Print headline: Trial and error: prosecuting evil

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry