Absolutely good, good; relatively good, better

January 24, 2013

A parallel set of A-level marks that compare a candidate’s performance with that of other pupils should be introduced to allow universities to identify top students, an academic has suggested.

Jonathan Clark, Hall distinguished professor of British history at the University of Kansas, said the current system of A levels did not allow university admissions officers to “discriminate between the good, the better and the best” because too many students achieved top grades.

Speaking at a seminar organised by Politeia, a centre-right thinktank, Professor Clark said each student should be given two sets of A-level grades: an “absolute” mark that indicated the candidate had hit certain standards and a “relative” mark that indicated how well they had performed against other students taking the exam that year.

“You might get an absolute A grade for history but only a relative B grade,” he told the seminar, entitled GCSE, A levels and Assessment: Questions for a Better System?, in London on 16 January.

This method would allow some groups, such as employers, to see if a candidate had reached a required level of study, while universities could use relative marks to select the best students, he argued.

This dual system of marks would resolve a “tension” between the two approaches to assessment, which had “fought against each other throughout the history of the [examinations],” he argued.

“Every school exam [must] provide an absolute measure of a candidate’s achievements, which are judged against previously published criteria,” he said.

“But we also need a relative measure of a candidate’s performance. Every exam is a passport to the next stage in a student’s career - the examination has to be able to weed out the better and the best.”

The British academic, a former fellow of All Souls College, Oxford and Peterhouse, Cambridge, said the system would also halt grade inflation because examination boards would be unlikely to award wildly different marks for absolute and relative grades.

“It will keep examiners honest,” Professor Clark said.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show