Managers need basic lessons in leadership

May 11, 2017

 In the feature “Leading lights” (4 May), Agnes Bäker and Amanda Goodall make an excellent and spot-on argument that the best academics make the best heads of department, which applies even higher up the academic management chain.

It is interesting to note how few senior university leaders have any knowledge of even the most basic of management scholarship (they certainly know less than your average MBA from an average institution). Being unversed in many very basic ideas, they rely increasingly on consultants, search firms and “professional” staff to fill them in on things, with those groups ultimately driving the direction of university strategies. Because these groups are themselves hardly leading edge, you end up with rather weak and unjustified logics driving strategy and operations (eg, SWOT analysis – strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats – which I ban in my MBA classes because I view it as little more than a Substantial Waste of Time) and the inevitable pendulum of centralisation and decentralisation of services.

I recently had a discussion with some senior university managers about Alfred Chandler. I could tell immediately that they had never heard of Chandler (which would be like a chemist not knowing Joseph Priestley). My point with them was that Chandler first articulated the idea that strategy needed to precede structure – that is, you build your structure to drive through your strategy – while at universities we allow structure to drive strategy – doing little more than reinforcing the existing viewpoints and power structures, thus removing any ability to change direction successfully.

You can manage people in a combination of two ways. One is that you can be a very competent manager who is not a role model but understands that fact and works to ensure that the people to whom they are responsible – who are far more talented in the key operational areas of scholarship and teaching – are given the environment and resources to succeed. The second is that you can be an inspiration and role model who understands the demands of the profession and works to represent and guide others. Unfortunately, the skills are not compensatory, and the best leaders need to be able to do both.

T. Devinney
Via timeshighereducation.com


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan