US alarm over poor literacy

January 27, 2006

Fewer and fewer American university graduates, raised on watching TV and surfing the web, know how to read and understand a book, according to a new national study of 19,000 people.

The study, by the Government's National Centre for Education Statistics, found that only 31 per cent of graduates could read a complex book and extrapolate from it. A decade ago, the proportion was 40 per cent.

Some 3 per cent of adults, or about 7 million people, were nonliterate, meaning that interviewers could not communicate with them in English. Even among graduate students, only 41 per cent could read and understand information in short texts, including product labels, compared with 51 per cent ten years ago.

Mark Schneider, NCES commissioner, did not have a solid explanation for the figures. He suggested that while people had become more literate with computers and other technology, they were losing the ability to read.

About 13 per cent of all adults had below-basic literacy, meaning they could not do much more than read and sign a simple form.

Some 63 million had basic literacy - they could understand information in a pamphlet about serving on a jury. Ninety-five million had intermediate literacy - they could look something up in a dictionary or encyclopaedia.

The US already has a worrying lack of graduates fluent in languages considered essential to national security.

This month, George W. Bush launched a $114 million (£64 million) programme to expand the teaching of Arabic, Urdu and Farsi. The National Security Language Initiative aims to produce 2,000 advanced speakers of Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Hindi and Central Asian languages to enhance not only national security but cultural understanding.

The Defence Department alone needs 3,000 people a year with basic language skills, yet among university students, less than 8 per cent take foreign language courses and only 1 per cent pursue a degree in a foreign language.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns