Stellacci ‘stripy nanoparticle’ dispute heats up

Analysis critical of professor’s discovery claim is published on arXiv

January 23, 2014

Source: Kobal

Closer look: new paper is sceptical of Stellacci’s ‘stripy nanoparticles’ research

A continuing war of words over “stripy nanoparticles” has reached new levels of acrimony following the appearance of a paper savaging data purporting to prove their existence.

The discovery of tiny particles of gold covered with stripes of other molecules called ligands was first reported in 2004 by Francesco Stellacci, now Constellium professor at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. He has since published about 30 papers on the subject.

However, as previously reported in Times Higher Education, in late 2012 Raphaël Lévy, a researcher in the University of Liverpool’s Institute of Integrative Biology, finally published – after three years of trying – a paper that dismissed evidence for their existence as an erroneous interpretation of microscopy data.

Under pressure from microscopy expert Philip Moriarty, professor of physics at the University of Nottingham, Professor Stellacci agreed to release his raw data, and asked three groups of researchers he characterised as “independent experts” to reproduce his work.

Their papers, which appeared in various publications in November, all concurred that Professor Stellacci’s data supported the existence of the particles.

However, in a new paper published on the physics pre-print server arXiv, Professor Moriarty, Dr Lévy and several others critique Professor Stellacci’s entire body of work on stripy nanoparticles and conclude that the evidence for the stripes amounts to what Professor Moriarty termed “a variety of other artefacts/noise, coupled with strong observer bias”.

“The most worrying aspect of this entire saga is that shockingly poor results and data analysis have made it through peer review so many times, to be published in what are regarded as some of the most prestigious scientific journals,” he said.

“This, coupled with the claims that the ‘stripiness’ can affect nanoparticle uptake by cells and may therefore have biomedical implications, makes this case a little bit more than just a ‘nano’ spat.”

But Professor Stellacci countered that the new paper, “Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles”, contradicts Dr Lévy’s earlier arguments and includes factual errors. Conversations with Professor Stellacci’s colleagues indicated that they were sceptical of its arguments even before the forthcoming publication of Professor Stellacci’s response to the paper, which he said would “show how most of the arguments are wrong”.

The three groups that had confirmed his results – and with which he had “no ties” – had had their own analyses confirmed by a fourth group, he said.

“I have undergone the most rigorous process that a scientific process can take and there has been a consensus answer. This is undeniable,” he added.

He said he would send Professor Moriarty a sample of stripy nanoparticles when he had found further independent groups willing to analyse them.

“But I am really against this approach where we have a self-nominated king, whose images are the only ones that contain ‘the truth’, [especially] when the bias of this king is clear,” Professor Stellacci said.

“A year from the start of this story, and it is clearly apparent that this group will twist any data in front of them with the clear purpose of tarnishing my reputation.”

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (2)

One of the (many) interesting aspects of this story is the new forms of scientific publishing. Our paper "Critical assessment of the evidence for striped nanoparticles" has been published on the arXiv preprint server and is under peer review at PloS One, but it has already attracted over 100 comments at the site PubPeer which is dedicated to post-publication peer review. https://pubpeer.com/publications/B02C5ED24DB280ABD0FCC59B872D04
Prof. Stellacci states: "I have undergone the most rigorous process that a scientific process can take and there has been a consensus answer. This is undeniable". There is not at all a consensus answer. Indeed, the remarkable aspect of this stripy 'saga' is that the work from 2013, far from supporting/vindicating the earlier results, actually shows up all of its flaws and clearly demonstrates that world-leading groups cannot reproduce the images of stripes obtained by Stellacci et al. in the period 2004 - 2012. We cover this in great detail in our paper and, as Raphael states in his comment (23 Jan 2014 10:25 AM), over at PubPeer. However, for those who haven't got the time to read through the minutiae of our technical critique, this short blog post shows how the data from 2013 in no way support/confirm the earlier results from Stellacci's group: http://raphazlab.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/the-emperors-new-stripes/

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Professor-Keith Cameron Chair of Australian History UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN (UCD)
Senior Procurement Officer UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF SCOTLAND
Clinician, Small Animal Emergency Services UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN (UCD)
Director COVENTRY UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest

Microlight pilot flies with flock of cranes

Reports of UK-based researchers already thinking of moving overseas after Brexit vote