Scientific advice for UK ministers to be more 'practical' and 'sophisticated'

October 24, 2005

Brussels, 21 Oct 2005

The UK's Chief Scientific Advisor has set out new guidelines on the advice provided to ministers, highlighting horizon scanning and greater openness as priorities.

Scientists are playing an increasingly important role in the forming of policies and decisions at government level. Guaranteeing that the advice provided by scientists to ministers is well-substantiated and balanced is therefore critical.

'The environment in which ministers make key decisions is changing. With the scientific community now able to provide sound evidence and analysis on complex issues, more public interest in evidence-based issues, and greater media scrutiny, a key challenge is the government's ability to maintain the public's confidence in the decision making process,' said Chief Scientific Advisor Sir David King.

It is vital 'not only for scientists but everyone in government, to ensure that key decision makers have a credible, reliable and objective evidence base on which to make decisions,' he added.

The revised guidelines bring a more practical and sophisticated approach to providing advice, according to Sir David. They call for:

  • departments to have horizon scanning procedures in place;
  • the evidence used in policy advice to be subject to peer review, or an appropriate quality assurance process;
  • a more balanced approach in the use of research methods;
  • a greater emphasis on identifying and improving any weaknesses in the evidence base as a general principle;
  • outlining clear priorities for engaging in public dialogue over science and technology issues.

In the UK in recent years, scientific evidence and advice has influenced a number of key decisions, including those on: national breast and cervical screening programmes; the over 30 month rule on cattle entering the human food chain; and the prohibition on smoking in public places.

The updated guidelines

CORDIS RTD-NEWS/© European Communities, 2001
Item source

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns