Research funders must club together to address grand challenges

Paper from Science Europe says not enough done at EU level for fundamental interdisciplinary research

December 21, 2014

Science funders across Europe need to come together to invest in fundamental interdisciplinary research that can address global challenges like climate change because of the lack of European Union support for such programmes.

This is the view of a committee of Science Europe, a research funding association, who say that existing EU funding schemes are focused on applied research or investigator-driven projects and not basic science.

Collaborative basic research in the life, environmental and geosciences that will help better understand the issues of food security, emerging diseases and environmental challenges, the committee argues in an opinion paper.

The paper, The Importance of International Collaboration for Fostering Frontier Research by the Life, Environmental and Geo Sciences Committee, explains how current EU funding mechanisms fall short.

“With the European Research Council grant scheme being dedicated to investigator-driven research, the current absence of ERC Synergy Grants from the funding schemes, and the Horizon 2020 Societal Challenges primarily focused on near-market applied research, the Committee highlights the limited funding opportunities for collaborative frontier research at EU level,” it says.

Furthermore, an analysis of schemes offered by research funders worldwide revealed that existing programmes lack interdisciplinarity, and do not include a sufficient number of international partners, according to the committee.

“National research funding organisations should consider increasing their efforts to widen the participation of various European countries and global partners in multilateral schemes,” says the paper, published this week.

It says that new programmes should fund proof of concept research designed to bridge the gap between frontier science and early stage innovations. Research ideas should come from the research community themselves, it adds.

“Progress in understanding global challenges and complex living systems depends on fostering collaborative frontier research,” the paper says.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns