Research elite fear new institute will take FP7 cash

October 20, 2006

Leading research universities have attacked plans to allow a European Institute of Technology to issue degrees and take money from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme.

Katrien Maes, executive director of the League of European Research Universities (Leru), said: "Europe has a number of very good research universities. An initiative such as this will not contribute to strengthening them."

The Commission said this week that EIT degrees should be awarded by consortia working within the EIT's proposed six knowledge and innovation communities.

Brussels said it was crucial to the institute's global reputation that these were clearly identifiable as "EIT degrees".

Leru counts Cambridge, Edinburgh and Oxford universities and University College London among its 20 members. A key concern for the league was the €2.4 billion (£1.6 billion) EIT budget, proposed in Brussels for 2007-13 by European Commission President José Manuel Barroso, Education Commissioner Ján Figel and Research Commissioner Janez Potonik.

While the €308 million launch funding would come from an unallocated fund for competitiveness, the Commission accepts that already allocated 2007-13 budgets would also be tapped. These would include FP7, lifelong learning programmes, structural (regional development) funds and the European Union competitiveness and innovation programme.

President Barroso said: "The EIT will tear down the walls between research, education and business to unlock Europe's potential for innovation."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns