Questions of cost and usefulness dog e-learning

June 4, 2009

Many academics see e-learning as "expensive and time-consuming", a survey has found.

About half of university staff polled believe that learning technologies are popular with students but only a small proportion of academics are embracing them.

In the survey of 125 university staff conducted by IMC (UK) Learning Ltd, a learning technology company, just 14 per cent of respondents recorded lectures and made them available online, per cent thought that e-learning saved money and 18 per cent thought it saved time for teaching staff.

One respondent, an external examiner for a university that offers distance learning, said e-learning technologies required just as much effort as face-to-face teaching. "I don't believe that simply making a DVD of a talk-and-chalk lecture is satisfactory," he added.

Another said: "It takes much, much longer to create high-quality e-learning material than to prepare for a traditional form of teaching to achieve the same level of learning and outcome."

Other respondents emphasised the importance of personal interactions for learning.

Because of its limitations in this respect, e-learning was "at best a supplement to traditional teaching", one academic said.

"E-learning is not as good as face-to-face interaction, but it is sometimes a necessity, in which case we always try to do it as well as we can. It therefore takes quite a bit of effort, and it is never our intention to use e-learning to save the educational efforts of academics," another respondent said.

There was also concern about the fact that "students are increasingly expecting e-learning resources to be sufficient for their needs. As a result, they are losing the skills of note-taking as well as of listening to and concentrating throughout 50-minute lectures."

Many respondents expressed worry about lectures being routinely made available online: "This leads to poor lecture attendance and we then observe cramming for exams at far too late a stage," one said.

Despite their reservations, other respondents said that e-learning had benefits, although many academics emphasised that it should never be considered as a "cost-cutting" tool.

rebecca.attwood@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns