Oxford hits £2 billion in fundraising campaign

The University of Oxford is on track to meet an ambitious fundraising target after hitting the £2 billion milestone

May 12, 2015

Almost 20 per cent of Oxford’s collegiate alumni made gifts to their alma mater in 2013-14, helping the university to raise £750 million in three years.

Oxford said that this was the shortest period of time in which such an amount had been raised by a university in Europe, adding that this puts the university on track to meet its target of raising £3 billion.

Such multibillion-pound fundraising campaigns are more common in the US, where Ivy League universities can pull in $4 billion to $6 billion (£2.6 billion to £3.8 billion) in less than a decade.

In August 2004, Oxford launched its Oxford Thinking campaign to raise funds for its colleges and the central university. By October 2010, it had reached the £1 billion milestone, and its initial target of £1.25 billion was met soon afterwards. In response, the university upped its target to £3 billion.

The university has raised the second billion at a pace of £200 million a year, which it says is the fastest rate in UK higher education.

It will use the money to bolster teaching and research activity and to fund new scholarships, academic positions and infrastructure.

Almost 50,000 gifts have come from alumni, philanthropists and organisations. Among these are £75 million from the venture capitalist Michael Moritz and his wife, writer Harriet Heyman, to create a scholarship scheme for undergraduate students from lower-income backgrounds and a £20 million pledge from the Hong Kong entrepreneur Li Ka-shing to create a big data medical research centre.

Andrew Hamilton, vice-chancellor of Oxford, said reaching £2 billion was an “outstanding achievement” for the university and the institution was “extremely grateful” for those who have made it possible.

“Their generosity is benefiting the entire Oxford collegiate community through increased financial support for students, ambitious programmes of academic research and high-quality new buildings and facilities,” he said.

“Oxford will need ever-greater financial freedom in support of our mission to foster academic excellence at the highest level for the greatest common good,” Professor Hamilton added.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

No reason why anyone should give money to a University whose dons elect as Rector of one of their colleges a man who tried to cut over 300 teaching posts in London. The Oxford ostrich who hides her head in the sand in hope of reward is alive and very well, thank you. Rhodes scholars should blush, and Merton review its list of honorary fellows.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham