Metrics survey reveals widespread scepticism

There is widespread ‘scepticism’ about the use of metrics to assess research, according to evidence submitted to an independent review

November 5, 2014

Just one fifth of those who gave evidence to the Higher Education Funding Council for England’s inquiry supported the increased use of metrics, such as citation data, when determining the excellence of research.

Many raised concerns that metrics “unfairly disadvantage” the arts, humanities and social sciences.

David Willetts, the former universities and science minister, launched a review in April to explore the role that metrics could play in judging research quality. The following month Hefce called for evidence from the higher education sector about the use of these indicators.

It received more than 150 responses from universities, individuals, learned societies, providers and mission groups.

A quarter of the respondents expressed ambivalence about the use of metrics. Many of those who supported or were ambivalent about metrics said that they could enhance the research assessment process by making it easier to establish a common understanding of what research is across disciplines, for example.

But others worried that they could not be used to assess research in some disciplines, giving specific subject examples of law, English literature, nursing and criminology. A small number of respondents added that metrics could unfairly disadvantage interdisciplinary research.

Sceptics said that metrics could never replace peer review and even many of those supportive of metrics believed that they should be used to support peer reviewers’ judgements.

“Many responses argued that changes should only be made to the established methods for research assessment where they could be demonstrated to provide improvement,” said a document summarising the evidence published by Hefce on 5 November.

Other concerns expressed by respondents included the robustness of current metrics, with some raising the fact that academic work can be highly cited if it is controversial or if the author cites his or herself frequently.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Lecturer in Business and Management

De Montfort University

Reader in International Development

University Of Wolverhampton

School and College Engagement Officer

University Of Chichester

Pro Vice-Chancellor

Cranfield University

Professor of Business and Management

De Montfort University
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes